Analysis Report for AUST11 ($13AUG07XA) (Analyzed by David Gordon, GSFC Analysis Center. Spoolfile source: interactive solve/nuSolve analysis.) Difx correlated at Curtin University. Fourfit fringed at University of Tasmania. Databases made at GSFC. Problems: None. Parameterization comments: None. Other comments: 3C274 is in the schedule with the position of M84. Therefore '3C274' was changed to 'M84' when the database was made. However, all of those observations have QC=0 (not detected) in either S-band or both bands. ----------------------------------------- Session Statistics Observations: 1131 scheduled 1046 correlated (in database) 1000 recoverable (usable) 961 used Session fit: 30.113 ps ----------------------------------------- Station Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HART15M 296 258 249 84.1% HOBART12 493 441 425 86.2% KATH12M 541 479 456 84.3% WARK12M 359 314 304 84.7% YARRA12M 573 508 488 85.2% --------------- --------- ----------- --------- ------ Station Total** 1131 1000 961 85.0% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. ** Total includes distinct observations only. MISSED: Station was scheduled, but it did not observe. NOT CORR: Station was scheduled but not correlated. NOT USED: Usable data was generated for this station, but the analyst rejected it all. ----------------------------------------- Source Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Correlated* Used % of scheduled obs used 0738+313 10 8 7 70.0% 1741-038 16 14 13 81.2% 1922-224 21 20 18 85.7% 1055+018 13 13 12 92.3% 0826-373 35 35 34 97.1% 0945+408 7 7 3 42.9% 0754+100 28 28 25 89.3% 0607-157 11 11 11 100.0% 1417+385 16 10 9 56.2% 1156+295 19 13 11 57.9% 3C274 22 0 0 0.0% 1606+106 4 4 4 100.0% 1124-186 7 7 7 100.0% 1144-379 34 33 31 91.2% 0823+033 9 9 7 77.8% 1921-293 25 25 23 92.0% 1749+096 11 11 11 100.0% 1038+064 13 12 11 84.6% 1243-072 9 8 6 66.7% 1032-199 4 4 4 100.0% 1406-076 8 8 8 100.0% 1655+077 7 7 4 57.1% 0700-197 7 7 7 100.0% 0919-260 23 23 18 78.3% 1034-293 17 17 11 64.7% 1057-797 52 50 48 92.3% 1302-102 10 10 8 80.0% NRAO530 24 24 23 95.8% 1920-211 17 15 15 88.2% 1255-316 13 13 13 100.0% 1759-396 23 23 19 82.6% 0208-512 42 42 39 92.9% 0637-752 49 46 41 83.7% 1334-127 10 5 5 50.0% 1923+210 9 9 9 100.0% 1351-018 11 11 11 100.0% 1510-089 16 13 13 81.2% 1705+018 5 4 4 80.0% 2144+092 17 17 17 100.0% 1451-375 16 15 15 93.8% 3C446 23 23 23 100.0% 1519-273 12 12 11 91.7% 1045-188 9 9 9 100.0% 1514-241 15 12 12 80.0% 1908-201 16 16 15 93.8% 2243-123 22 21 21 95.5% 1424-418 24 22 21 87.5% 1622-297 6 6 4 66.7% 0405-385 15 15 13 86.7% 1739+522 2 2 1 50.0% 2113+293 6 6 6 100.0% 1548+056 4 3 3 75.0% 0003-066 18 16 16 88.9% 2227-088 15 15 15 100.0% 0537-441 23 20 20 87.0% 2345-167 17 17 15 88.2% 0402-362 17 16 16 94.1% 0119+115 29 24 20 69.0% 0048-097 20 20 19 95.0% 0215+015 12 12 11 91.7% 0451-282 8 8 8 100.0% 1622-253 6 6 5 83.3% 0133+476 4 4 4 100.0% 0239+108 12 11 10 83.3% CTA26 18 18 15 83.3% 0420-014 18 18 17 94.4% 0537-286 4 4 4 100.0% 0322+222 6 6 4 66.7% NRAO190 16 15 13 81.2% 0642+449 3 2 1 33.3% 0556+238 12 10 10 83.3% 0458-020 9 9 9 100.0% 0627-199 6 6 4 66.7% 0632-235 3 1 1 33.3% 0955+476 2 1 1 50.0% 0648-165 9 9 9 100.0% ------------ --------- ---------- ------ ------ Source Total 1131 1046 961 85.0% * Correlated: included in database ----------------------------------------- Baseline Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HART15M-HOBART12 45 39 39 86.7% HART15M-KATH12M 75 65 61 81.3% HART15M-WARK12M 31 29 27 87.1% HART15M-YARRA12M 145 125 122 84.1% HOBART12-KATH12M 166 151 144 86.7% HOBART12-WARK12M 131 117 113 86.3% HOBART12-YARRA12M 151 134 129 85.4% KATH12M-WARK12M 110 91 89 80.9% KATH12M-YARRA12M 190 172 162 85.3% WARK12M-YARRA12M 87 77 75 86.2% ----------------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------ Baseline Total 1131 1000 961 85.0% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. MISSED: Baseline was scheduled, but at least one of the sites did not observe. NOT CORR: Baseline was scheduled but not correlated. NO DATA: The baseline's stations were both correlated, but they did not observe together. DESELECTED: Usable data was generated for the baseline, but the analyst rejected it.